I know it seems like a dumb question but sometimes higher numbers are worse than lower. I'm just trying to make sure that this isn't the case with wide angle lenses.
I have a sony dsc F828
On ebay there are many .45x wide angle lenses (or filters if you want to be technical) and only one or two .65x lenses. The .45x lenses go for cheap and the only one .65x is going for $100.
Canon EOS Digital Rebel (EOS 300D) Review - photo.net::
Its a decent lens, better when not used wide open, and is certainly very good Wide-angle is a very real issue, but the other side of the coin is that this
http://photo.net/equipment/canon/300D/HOME |
eBay – Lens Accessories, Lenses Accessories and Camcorder Accessories ::
Century Optics .65x Wide Angle Converter MKII 58mm. 2 Bids $1.04. 3d 22h 1m Take better photographs with a new lens (wideangel, telephoto) or filter (Tiffen,
http://photography.shop.ebay.com/items/Lens-Accessories__W_trksidZp3286Q2ec0Q2em282HOME |
Suggestions/comments. Oh and I need a wide angle lense asap so If anyone has one.........
:mrgreen: :thumbup:
I noticed my old $25 film camera was wider than my new S5500 with a .45x on it. Seems like most cameras (other than the full framers) need wide zoom lenses just so they are decently wide (for prosumer zlr cameras,) but a fisheye for a cameras with the 24x35mm sensor is crazy for the price to get it as wide as on a film camera.. Products | Microscopes TrueVision::
Our wide selection includes units that have USA FDA (Food and Drug So which is better? Well, really neither. They are the same.
http://www.truevisionmicroscopes.com/tv-products.phpHOME |
Heh! Ironically enough I should be finishing my "test" review of two eBay wide angle adapters today. Mine are the .42x and .45x though no .65x
The Digital Video Information Network - More Wide Angle Converter Questions::
Are they any better. Tom , what you see on my pics, is that normal for you? Regarding the Titanium .45x lens, no I havent had a chance to do any real
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/sony-trv950-pdx10-companion/172er-questions-3-print.htmlHOME |
www.cdrlabs.com/common/print.php?type=review&id=231::
In our tests, the drive was able to write to all of our test media at its rated speed or better. tested the drive with a wide range of media, and even at
http://www.cdrlabs.com/common/print.php?type=review&id=231HOME |
I'll let you know when I have it all posted.
I guess it's back to the HTML coding then for me :cry:
^^^ditto. The .45 and .65 is like the focal length multiplier of you digital SLRs, most of which are a 1.5 or a 1.6, so if you had a 1.5 and put a .45 wide angle adapter, it would almost make the lens that you're using have an accurate focal length. I hope this made some sort of sense.
.45x is wider than .65x not a huge difference but defintely wider, with digital cameras because of the field of view (or crop factor usually 1.6x) you need a super wide lense to get the same effect as a lense not as wide on film, go for the .45
 Nobody understands...any help please?
 50 points for someone willing to do this!!!!!!!!!!?
|
Wide Angle.... Which is better .45x or .65x ???