www.lermanet.com/reference/mcpherson/Haney-V1.txt::
4 THE COURT: That is true. But you know what, I 5 didnt delete that. see in the Texas judgment where you were 25 ordered personally to pay a
http://www.lermanet.com/reference/mcpherson/Haney-V1.txtHOME |
The judge, jury, and the opposing lawyers are not supposed to personally know the accuser and/or the accused when conducting a trial right?
Is that true?
The jurors are not to serve if they know the judge, lawyer, prosecutor or defendant. The judge and lawyers often times know the defendant since he/she may have been tried in that jurisdiction before. CNN - Simpson Civil Trial::
3 Q. Its supposed to be a sketching of the 4 injuries you saw on the left hand; is that correct? Page -- 12 THE COURT: Its hearsay of Phillips and 13
http://www.cnn.com/US/OJ/simpson.civil.trial/transcripts.novemberript.html?iref=newssearchHOME |
Newsletter: Wellness Update::
Some of you may know it as Salba, but youre paying double for nearly the same thing. of the court over a defendant without submitting to such jurisdiction)
http://www.mnwelldir.org/nw_current.htmHOME |
I'm not aware of any specific rule or law but common sense dictates that it's a big mistake for anyone of those parties you mentioned to have any sort of relationship with a defendant.
A defendants lawyer is supposed to recuse any jurors (to reject or challenge (a judge or juror) as disqualified to act, esp. because of interest or bias) like that during selection so IF one got through without a lawyer challenging them and IF the defendant didn't speak up and say something then that person could sit on a jury.
Brain Fingerprinting - Legal Issues in Admissability::
FOR THE DEFENDANT: 3 MR. LAWRENCE A. FARWELL, PhD. Brain Wave 6 information to let you know it was a 12-gauge. 7 shotgun that actually committed the crime?
http://www.brainwavescience.com/Hughes Recantation.phpHOME |
Think Progress Chief Justice Roberts defends Exxon.::
personally believe that Exxon does need to be punished for this รข Its clear that Scalia is the true @ss on the court. February 28th, 2008 at 12:12 pm
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/chief-justice-roberts-defends-exxonHOME |
As for the Judge, that would be not only an ethics violation but, if it was discovered, be serious grounds for appeal. Any Judge is supposed to recuse himself (to withdraw from a position of judging so as to avoid any semblance of partiality or bias) if he has a personal relationship with any of the parties involved.
The same should hold true for the opposing lawyer as well. State/Provincial Bar Assn rules would dictate that I believe. United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Leo Spanos, Defendant ::
It is true that the Peoni and Cianchetti cases deal with the sufficientcy by Godwin at the trial, to bolster a supposed prima facie case and thus turn it
http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/462/1012/280725HOME |
Hit & Run > The Puzzle of Punitive Damages - Reason Magazine::
If its been declared that nobody can prove that you committed a crime, mere justice for the plaintiff wont get the defendant to change their behavior.
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/125767.htmlHOME |
Sort of. If the judge or members of the jury know either party, they must disclose their relationship. If there is no objection from the lawyers or their clients, then a recussal is not required.
For example, in a small town, everyone may know everyone else. As such, simply knowing the person on trial is not enough to warrant recussal. However, if the judge or jury can BENEFIT from this relational, than recussal is expected.
 How to find out if i/someone has an arrest warrant, for free?
 How do i copyright, patent or trademark an idea and how much will each cost?
|
Is It True That For A Court Trial Nobody Is Supposed To Personally Know The Plaintiff/Defendant?